Rag Time is a regular investigation into the stories you see in the tabloids, with the context you don’t.
Advertisement
At Tuesday’s hearing, Loughlin and Giannulli waived their rights to separate attorneys and made clear their desire to present a "united front" in the case. They each wore conservative outfits and attempted to avoid the media by entering the court through the back door, appearing much more serious than they did during their last visit to Boston, when Loughlin signed autographs and took selfies with fans. Both face up to 40 years in prison if convicted.Since Loughlin and Giannulli were indicted in March, the tabloids have covered the case obsessively. Loughlin has appeared on the covers of People and Us Weekly multiple times in the last few months. At the beginning, she often appeared alongside Felicity Huffman, who was charged with mail fraud after allegedly paying $15,000 to adjust her daughter’s SAT scores. Once Huffman took a plea deal in May, though, Loughlin became the main story, with multiple insiders regularly offering a tabloid window into her state of mind.Unless Loughlin and Giannulli are able to make some kind of deal with prosecutors, they will go to trial in the coming months. What will they argue in court? The couple has wisely decided not to sit for interviews or offer any comment on the case. Giannulli, especially, has kept out of the spotlight since the charges were filed. But "sources close to Loughlin" have been very chatty with the tabloids, offering hints about the kind of defense she will mount in court. Let’s review what they had to say.
Advertisement
"She is very faith-based"
Advertisement
Will this "faith-based" routine help Loughlin in court? Others have certainly tried it (see: Mischa Barton attending mass in a white dress after getting a D.U.I. in 2008.) At the very least, we can probably expect Loughlin to bring up her faith if she takes the stand.Before Loughlin and Giannulli decided to present a "united front" in their defense, sources close to Loughlin floated the idea that Giannulli was really to blame for the whole scandal. In April, just after Loughlin and Giannulli pleaded not guilty and realized they were looking at serious jail time if convicted at trial, Us Weekly reported that Loughlin was "constantly arguing" with her husband."Lori is constantly arguing with Mossimo because she is beginning to grasp that they are in very serious jeopardy," a source told the tabloid.In the same week, another source told Us Weekly that Loughlin’s "inner circle" had concerns about Giannulli. "Everyone feels bad for her," the insider said. "They think the situation was something concocted by her husband."People never picked up on this line of defense, and Us Weekly’s sources quickly abandoned it. Perhaps they were advised that throwing Giannulli under the bus wouldn’t help Loughlin’s case in the end. Last week, a source told People, "Lori and Mossimo are united in this. They’re going to face this together, and they believe that together they can beat this and move on with their lives. You won’t see one of them turning on the other."
"Everyone feels bad for her"
Advertisement
Well, at least from this point forward you won’t.In the weeks after Loughlin and Giannulli pleaded not guilty, certain sources suggested that by allegedly paying $500,000 in bribes to get her daughters accepted into USC, Loughlin was just being a good mom. "From the beginning, she didn’t want to take a deal, because she felt that she hadn’t done anything that any mom wouldn’t have done, if they had the means to do so," a source told People in April.Another source told the tabloid that Loughlin and Giannulli were "surprised" to be charged. "You read the complaint and they look like criminal masterminds," the source said. "But they really didn’t know the legalities of what was going on. They’re not lawyers and they’re not experts. They were parents who simply wanted to make sure that their daughters got into a good school."In the months since, sources have built on that line of thinking, telling People and Us Weekly that Loughlin did not think what she was doing was wrong. Last week, Loughlin again appeared on the cover of People, flanked by her two daughters, in the run-up to Tuesday’s hearing. A "legal source" told the tabloid, "Lori is remorseful, and she has definite regrets. She’s embarrassed and hurt, and she knows that her reputation has been ruined for life.""But she also believes the allegations against her aren’t true," the source continued. "She honestly didn’t think what she was doing was any different than donating money for a library or athletic field. That’s the crux of why she pleaded not guilty."This "legal source" has given us the clearest picture yet of the kind of argument Loughlin and Giannulli could make in court—that they did not realize what they did was illegal. Given the overwhelming amount of evidence against them, this will be difficult for them to prove. According to the complaint, Loughlin and Giannulli knew, at the very least, that they were misleading USC by attempting to designate their daughters as recruits to the crew team—a sport the girls never played.Of course, all of these sources close to Loughlin, who have said the same things over and over, could be wrong. Maybe they are not close to Loughlin at all! That’s what Loughlin’s more outspoken daughter, Olivia Jade, would like you think, anyway. The former YouTuber and social media influencer returned to Instagram earlier this month after a lengthy hiatus to flip the bird to tabloids and gossip blogs including People, The Daily Mail, and Perez Hilton:For the sake of Olivia’s future influencing career and her parents’ future freedom, let’s hope that she’s right, and that Loughlin and Giannulli have a rock-solid defense that sources have not yet shared with the tabloids.Got a tip about this or any other celebrity mysteries? Email Allie at ragtime@vice.com, or contact her on Twitter .